Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.30 seconds)Section 2 in The Urban Land (Ceiling And Regulation) Act, 1976 [Entire Act]
State Of Up vs Adarsh Seva Sahkari Samiti Ltd on 27 January, 2015
19. The learned High Court Government Pleader while
opposing this writ petition, would rely upon the judgment
rendered by the Apex Court in the matter of State of Uttar
Pradesh and others vs. Adarsh Seva Sahkari Samiti
Limited reported in ((2016) 12 Supreme Court Cases 493).
In the said matter, the lands which were the subject-matter in
the appeals, had been purchased by the respondent therein -
Adarsh Seva Sahkari Samiti Limited from the original
declarants / landowners during the years 1991-92. After the
order under Section 8(4) of the ULC Act was passed and
notification was issued under Section 10(3) of the ULC Act, the
same was followed by issuance of notice under Section 10(5)
of the Act to the declarant calling upon him to deliver
possession of the land declared as surplus. The Apex Court,
having regard to the undisputed fact that the respondent had
purchased the property from the declarant which was vested
with the State Government under Section 10(5) of the ULC Act
in terms of Section 10(3) notification under the said Act, held
that the transfer of the said property in favour of the
respondent, who was claiming its interest in the said property
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Gjanan Kamlya Patil vs Addl.Collector & Comp.Auth.(Ulc) & Ors on 14 February, 2014
In that view of
the matter, the said judgment of the Apex Court in Gajanan
Kamlya Patil's case would also not enure to the benefit of the
petitioner.
The Urban land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of U.P vs Hari Ram on 11 March, 2013
matter of State of U.P. vs. Hari Ram reported in ((2013) 4
SCC 280), wherein the meaning and context of Sub-sections
(3) to (6) of Section 10 of the ULC Act was examined by the
Apex Court and the manner in which possession was required
to be taken when the same was not surrendered by the land
owner and also the procedure, which was required to be
followed while taking forcible possession of the land was also
discussed by the Apex Court. The Hon`ble Apex Court in para
No.12 of the said judgment has held as under:
1