Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.43 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
Article 65 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Karnataka Rent Act, 1999
Section 3 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 109 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
The Limitation Act, 1963
Ayisabeevi And Anr. vs Aboobacker on 24 December, 1970
39. Looking into the dictum laid down by their lordship
in the above two decisions, it can be said that the same is
aptly applicable to the case in hand. Even in the present case
also admittedly Ex.P1 notice was served upon the defendant
and he gave reply to the notice as per Ex.P2. So also Ex.P3
termination notice was sent to the same address which was
shown in Ex.P1 notice. When that would be the case, it can
be held that it is a deemed service under law. Apart from that
DW1 during the course of his cross examination at page No.7
in the middle portion has admitted with regard to the said
aspect. At this juncture it would be relevant to quote the said
evidence given by him which reads as under:
Dev Kishan vs . Nand Prakash & Anr. on 1 December, 2015
So also in another decision reported in AIR 2016
Rajasthan page 18 between Dev Kishan Vs. Nand Prakash and
another, wherein it was held by their lordship that;