Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.49 seconds)U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Section 2 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Hindustan Steel Ltd vs The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, ... on 15 September, 1976
In support of his submission the learned counsel has placed reliance on a judgment reported in Hindustan Steel Ltd. Apellant v. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Orissa and Ors., respondents." (I977-I-LU-1). The learned counsel says that in this case the Honb'le Supreme Court has taken into account the provision of Sections 2(oo) and 25(F) and has held that automatic termination of service on efflux of contractual period amounts to retrenchment and non-compliance of provisions Sec 25(F) is fatal. The learned counsel has urged that the facts apply with full force to the facts of the present case and the respondent who is workman cannot be deprived benefit of his employment on the ground that he was merely working on contract basis for fixed period.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 6N in U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Director, Institute Of Management ... vs Smt. Pushpa Srivastava on 4 August, 1992
12. We, however, take a sympathetic view as has been done in the case of Director, Institute of Management Development of U.P, v Pushpa Srivastava (supra) and say that it will be open to the appellants to engage the petitioner in service if they desire, and this judgment will not come into the way of their taking into consideration the petitioner's engagement on Class-Ill post.
1