Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.28 seconds)

Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Iii vs M/S Lavanya Land Pvt. Ltd. on 5 August, 2019

The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in case of CIT vs. Lavanya Lands Pvt. Ltd., 397 ITR 246 (Bom.) held that where seized documents were not in name of the assessee, no action could be taken in case of assessee u/s 153C of the Act and further, the entire decision being based on huge amounts revealed from seized documents not being 14 ITA No.547 & IT(SS)A 56/Srt/2024 A.Y 20-21 Rajesh Poddar supported by actual cash passing hands, addition u/s 69C of the Act was not sustainable.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 14 - Full Document

M/S. Deluxe Tube Traders & Scrap ... vs Income-Tax Officer,, on 27 March, 2018

The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in case of CIT vs. M. P. Scrap Trader, 372 ITR 507 (Guj.) held that where the AO, while making addition in the hands of the assessee-firm as well as its partners, solely relied upon statement of partner recorded at the time of survey, which was subsequently retracted, additions made by the AO were to be deleted. In view of these authoritative precedents and after considering the facts as discussed above, we are of the considered view that there is no infirmity in the order of CIT(A), which we confirm. Accordingly, ground Nos. 1 and 2 of the appeal of revenue are dismissed.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 2 - Cited by 15 - Full Document
1   2 Next