Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.21 seconds)Commr.Of Police And Ors vs Sandeep Kumar on 17 March, 2011
In our opinion, there is no conflict between the judgments cited by Mrs.
Bhattacharya and the judgment in the case of Commissioner of Police and others
Versus Sandeep Kumar (supra). The court has merely opined that the modern
approach should be reformatory rather than branding a person a criminal all his
life. The court also observed that there cannot be automatic disqualification of
employment merely because a candidate does not mention he is involved in a
19
criminal case, probably out of fear. A more lenient view should be taken in the
matter.
The Right to Information Act, 2005
State Of Andhra Pradesh & Ors vs V. Sadanandam & Ors. Etc. Etc on 16 May, 1989
In the case of Daya Shankar Yadav Versus Union of India And Others
(supra), the Supreme Court has culled out the legal position in the matter after
taking a conspectus of its earlier judgments in the cases of Delhi Administration
16
Versus Sushil Kumar reported in (1996) 11 SCC 605, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan
v. Ram Ratan Yadav (supra), R. Radhakrishnan v. Director General of Police
(supra), Union of India v. Bipad Bhanjan Gayen (supra). The law has been in para
15 where the Court has observed thus:
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 325 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Union Of India & Ors vs Bipad Bhanjan Gayen on 9 May, 2008
In the case of Daya Shankar Yadav Versus Union of India And Others
(supra), the Supreme Court has culled out the legal position in the matter after
taking a conspectus of its earlier judgments in the cases of Delhi Administration
16
Versus Sushil Kumar reported in (1996) 11 SCC 605, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan
v. Ram Ratan Yadav (supra), R. Radhakrishnan v. Director General of Police
(supra), Union of India v. Bipad Bhanjan Gayen (supra). The law has been in para
15 where the Court has observed thus:
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Ors vs Ram Ratan Yadav on 26 February, 2003
The submission of Mrs. Bhattacharya is that the decision of the
Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Police versus Sandeep Kumar
(supra) is per incuriam as it does not consider the earlier judgments of the Supreme
Court including the judgment in the case of Daya Shankar Yadav (supra).
R. Radhakrishnan vs The Director General Of Police And ... on 12 October, 2007
In the case of Daya Shankar Yadav Versus Union of India And Others
(supra), the Supreme Court has culled out the legal position in the matter after
taking a conspectus of its earlier judgments in the cases of Delhi Administration
16
Versus Sushil Kumar reported in (1996) 11 SCC 605, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan
v. Ram Ratan Yadav (supra), R. Radhakrishnan v. Director General of Police
(supra), Union of India v. Bipad Bhanjan Gayen (supra). The law has been in para
15 where the Court has observed thus:
1