Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.27 seconds)Section 16 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Section 15 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
The Arbitration Act, 1940
Section 14 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 17 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Proddatur Cable Tv Digi Services vs Siti Cable Network Limited on 20 January, 2020
11. There is the question of whether any such unilateral
appointment can ever survive in view of the recent decisions of the
Supreme Court, viz., Perkins Eastman Architect DPC & Anr vs
HSSC (India) Ltd.,1 Voestalpine Schienen GmbH v Delhi Metro Rail
Corporation Ltd.,2 TRF Ltd v Energo Engineering Products Ltd.3 In a
very recent decision in Proddatur Cable TV Digi Services v Siti Cable
Network Ltd,4 Ms Jyoti Singh J of the Delhi High Court held, in a
petition under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration Act, and after a
comprehensive review of precedent, that a unilateral appointment
by one party is invalid in view of Perkins Eastman. I am in most
respectful agreement with that view. The unilateral appointment of
Mr Sonawane by the Respondent is unlawful, illegal and non-est.