Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.26 seconds)
Kapil Hissaria vs Veerappan on 30 July, 2019 cites

Rajendran vs Mohanambal on 9 November, 2018

14.The plight of the pendente lite the purchaser was recently considered by this Court in Rajendran and Another vs Mohanambal 2018 SCC OnLine Mad 9064. The Court observed that if on a passing of a preliminary decree, a pendente lite has acquired a right through his vendors, then necessarily his right has to be similar to that of the other parties to the preliminary decree. Necessarily, a right to file an application for passing a final decree should be available to him, since no law bars him from filing one.
Madras High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 2 - N Seshasayee - Full Document

Annammal And Ors. vs Chellakutti on 31 July, 1962

And, the prevailing understanding of law on lis pendens vis a vis the right of hearing of a pendente litealienee, will now find it difficult to avoid a criticism that it prefers protecting the consequences of this fraud to saving the victims of fraud. Is this what the law intends to achieve? (See in the context Annammal v. Chellakutti [76 (1963) LW 215], where the First Bench of this Court has kept the termination of suit without a bonafide contest and its abandonment by http://www.judis.nic.in the plaintiff outside the purview of lis 8 pendens, but it requires judicial intervention in each particular case of similar variety, and does not provide a procedural safety to a pendente lite alienee)
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 7 - Full Document
1