Commissioner Of Income Tax, Madras-Ii vs I.A.E.C. (Pumps) Ltd., Madras on 3 April, 1997
Due to the sincere efforts of the applicant the agitating workers could be pacified. By letter dated 31.10.94 the Commodore Superintendent of NAY informed the applicant that it was proposed to hold an inquiry against him on 5 charges of misconduct or misbehaviour stated in the Annexure attached 'with the above letter. He submitted a statement on 24.11.94 denying the above charges and requested to drop all further proceedings, a departmental inquiry was ordered against the applicant by order dated 31.3.95. The first respondent as Disciplinary Authority passed the order exonerating the applicant of the charges I, III and IV and finding him guilty of charges II and V. A penalty of withholding of one increment without cumulative effect for a period of six months was imposed on the applicant as per A-2. He filed A-3 appeal dated 15.6.98. By A-4 order dated 29.12.98 the said appeal was rejected. Claiming that A-2 and A-4 orders were arbitrary and against the true facts the applicant filed this Original Application seeking the above reliefs.