Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (1.47 seconds)Section 14 in The Punjab Tenancy Rules [Entire Act]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Venkatesh Narahar Kattl vs Haji Saheb Khadir Saheb Mulla And ... on 13 October, 1965
In second Appeal No. 1243 of 1965, the learned Chief Justice quoted a passage form the Supreme Court judgment in Venkatesh Narhar v. H.K. Mulla, , and observed that the date of termination of tenancy gets postponed until the order by the Mamlatdar is passed under Section 29 92). he also relied on the same report in the judgment in Second Appeal No. 468 of 1965, which was delivered on April 24, 1973, while the other was decided on April 25, 1973. In Second Appeal No 468 of 1965, the learned Chief Justice observed that the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal passed an order of eviction on January 17, 1962 and the possession of the tenant became unlawful thereafter for the first time. In the other Appeal the Mamlatdar himself had passed the order in favour of the landlord on august 12, 1960, and the learned Chief Justice observed that that would be the starting point form which mesne profits can be calculated.