cites: 1718785

1 - 6 of 6 (0.27 seconds)

Pattnaik Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalinga Iron Works And Anr. on 1 May, 1984 cites

The Union Of India vs Kishorilal Gupta And Bros on 21 May, 1959

5. The next ground of attack was that the opposite party No. 1 having cancelled the contract, it could not rely on Clause 5 (f) of Ext. B or Clause 12 of Ext. A for the purpose of ousting the jurisdiction of the Court at Bhubaneswar. The short answer is in Union of India v. Kishorilal Gupta, AIR 1959 SC 1362.

Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 202 - Full Document

Damodar Valley Corporation vs K. K. Kar on 12 November, 1973

In Damodar Valley Corporation v. K.K. Kar, AIR 1974 SC 158, it has been held (at p. 161):

Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 131 - P J Reddy - Full Document

Rai And Sons Pvt. Ltd. vs Trikamji Kanji Gajjar And Sons And Ors. on 2 November, 1973

In Rai & Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. Trikamji Kanji, (1975) 16 Guj LR 31, Merit a, J. observed :

Gujarat High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Snehalkumar Sarabhai vs Economic Transport Organisation And ... on 18 March, 1974

In Snehalkumar Sarabhai v. Economic Transport Organisation, AIR 1975 Guj 72, M.P. Thakkar, J. (as he then was) observed (para 3):

Gujarat High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 11 - M P Thakkar - Full Document

Section 28 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 1669

Black Sea State Steamship Line, ... vs Minerals And Meta'S Trading ... on 20 June, 1969

In Black Sea State Steamship Line v. Minerals and Metals Trading Corpn. of India Ltd., (1970) 1 Mad LJ 548, the Bill of Lading clearly provided that all disputes arising in and in connection with the same shall be judged in U. S. S. R. The plaintiff brought an action in the Court of Small Causes at Madras. Objection was taken to the jurisdiction of the Court. That case involved the foreign jurisdiction clause and it was held :

Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search