Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.29 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
M Ravindran vs The Intelligence Officer Directorate ... on 26 October, 2020
30. Though, the observations of the Apex Court in
Kapil Wadhawan's case (supra) are stated to be in the
context of a reference and it is contended that
observations made are apart from answer to the issue of
reference which cannot be relied upon, however, we find
that the observations reiterate what the Apex Court had
stated in M. Ravindran's case(supra).
Section 167 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967
Ganesh Narayan Kindre (C-5065) vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 9 December, 2019
16. The Revisional Court, applying the law laid
down by the Division Bench of High Court of Judicature at
Bombay in Dinesh Ganesh Indre and Others v. The
State of Maharashtra1 has rejected the contention of the
petitioners and affirmed the order passed by the Special
Court.
Enforcement Directorate Government Of ... vs Kapil Wadhawan on 27 March, 2023
30. Though, the observations of the Apex Court in
Kapil Wadhawan's case (supra) are stated to be in the
context of a reference and it is contended that
observations made are apart from answer to the issue of
reference which cannot be relied upon, however, we find
that the observations reiterate what the Apex Court had
stated in M. Ravindran's case(supra).
Bikramjit Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 12 October, 2020
31. Accordingly, the right to default bail having
accrued even on a reasonable interpretation on
20.12.2025 and the petitioners having exercised their right
by 12.00 p.m. on 22.12.2025 were entitled to be released
on bail. The filing of the charge-sheet at 5.15 p.m. on
22.12.2025, which is later in point of time could not defeat
5
Bikramjit Singh v. State of Punjab, (2020) 10 SCC 616 : (2021) 1 SCC (Cri) 85
6
Sanjay Dutt v. State, (1994) 5 SCC 410 : 1994 SCC (Cri) 1433
Uday Mohanlal Acharya vs State Of Maharashtra on 29 March, 2001
NC: 2026:KHC:15100
CRL.P No. 2351 of 2026
C/W CRL.P No. 2320 of 2026
HC-KAR
maximum period of ninety days to complete the
investigation in case of 'Class of Offences' referred to in
Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C. Any order permitting
continuance of detention beyond the said period of ninety
days not being sanctioned under law would amount to
violation of Fundamental Right under Article 21 of the
Constitution of India. The above view is reflected in the
observations of Apex Court in case of Uday Mohanlal
Acharya v. State of Maharashtra8 and relevant
paragraph is extracted herein below:-