Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.27 seconds)M/S Icici Bank Limited vs Naveen Kalkal on 23 December, 2019
13. The present order along with the previous judgements in Kamal
Kumar Grewal (supra) and Naveen Kalkal (supra) be circulated by the
worthy Registrar General to all the district courts and civil judges. The
petition is disposed of in the above terms.
M/S Icici Bank Limited vs Nidhi Sharma on 23 December, 2019
8. It is submitted by Mr. Bhalla, ld. counsel for the Bank, that the Bank
is incurring parking charges for keeping the vehicle. It is further submitted
that the suit itself having been decreed, no useful purpose would be served
by not selling the vehicle. Ld. counsel also submits that despite orders
having been passed in M/s ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Naveen Kalkal [CM(M)
1821/2019, decided on 23rd December, 2019] and M/s. ICICI Bank Limited
v. Nidhi Sharma [CM (M) 1814/2019, decided on 23rd December, 2019],
which rely upon ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Kamal Kumar Garewal [FAO
49/2015, decided on 29th May, 2015], and the same having been placed
CM (M) 16/2020 Page 6 of 8
before the Trial Court, the same were not considered by the Trial Court and
the application seeking permission for sale of the vehicle has simply been
adjourned.
M/S Icici Bank Ltd vs Kamal Kumar Garewal on 29 May, 2015
13. The present order along with the previous judgements in Kamal
Kumar Grewal (supra) and Naveen Kalkal (supra) be circulated by the
worthy Registrar General to all the district courts and civil judges. The
petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
1