Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (1.27 seconds)State Of West Bengal vs Administrator, Howrah Municipality & ... on 14 December, 1971
In yet another judgment of our Honourable Apex Court reported in AIR 1972 SC 749 in between State of West Bengal Vs. Administrator, Howrah Municipality, it has been categorically laid down as follows:-
N. Balakrishnan vs M. Krishnamurthy on 3 September, 1998
9.I have given anxious thoughts to the arguments advanced on either side. Before going into the merits of the case, it has become absolutely necessary for this Court to refer the Judgment of the Honourable Apex Court reported in 1998(7) SCC 123 in between N.Balakrishnan Vs. M.Krishnamurthy, which reads as under:-
Sankaralingam And Anr. vs V. Rahuraman on 21 June, 2002
10.Similarly, the judgment of this Court reported in 2002(3) CTC 13 in between Sankaralingam and another Vs. V.Rahuraman would also enlighten this Court regarding the points to be pondered in a case of condonation of delay. The relevant portion would run as under:-
Periasamy, Perumayee And Selvi (Minor) ... vs Allimuthu, Nallammal And Gurumoorthy on 24 June, 2005
The other judgment of this Court made in 2005(3) MLJ 425 between Periasamy and others Vs. Allimuthu and others, would go to show as follows:-
Yanaimal Thottam Trust Rep. By Its ... vs B. Lakshmanan And B. Jayaraman on 4 July, 2005
11.In another judgment of this Court reported 2005(3) MLJ 439 between Yanaimal Thottam Trust Vs. B.Lakshmanan and another, it has been held as follows:-
Rathinathammal vs Muthusamy on 26 April, 2004
12.Similarly the judgment of this Court made in 2004(3) MLJ 36 between Rathinathammal Vs. Muthusamy and others, would run as follows:-
Section 115 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
1