Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 44 (1.54 seconds)Article 141 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Right to Information Act, 2005
The Lokpal And Lokayuktas Act, 2013
The Cpio, Supreme Court Of India, Tilak ... vs Subhash Chandra Agarwal & Anr. on 2 September, 2009
While RP Act 1951 consolidated
this right into a legal provision through amendment, the Lokpal Act 2013 extended
26 Secretary General, Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agrawal, LPA 501/2009 in full bench (led by Chief
Justice Vikramjit Sen, Justice AP Shah and Justice S Muralidhar) https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1342199/
27 Secretary General, Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agrawal, LPA 501/2009 in full bench
(led by Chief Justice Vikramjit Sen, Justice AP Shah and Justice S Muralidhar)
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1342199/
28 Surup Singh Hriya Nayak v State of Maharastra, AIR 2007 Bom 121.
Section 8 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
People`S Union For Civilliberties ... vs The Union Of India And Another on 18 December, 1996
c) As far as the assets related information is concerned, the Supreme Court's
order in PUCL v UoI and ADR v UoI besides the Lokpal Act. 2003 laid down
the law that public servant's assets related information is not personal
information but has to be disclosed under a statutory obligation and thus
could be disclosed under RTI Act.
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
R. Rajagopal vs State Of T.N on 7 October, 1994
The Supreme Court
was required to balance the right of privacy against the right to free speech in this
case, where the petitioner was a Tamil newsmagazine which had sought directions
from the Court to restrain the respondent State of Tamil Nadu and its officers to not
interfere in the publication of the autobiography of a death row convict-'Auto
25 R Rajgopal v State of Tamilnadu [(1996) 6 SCC 632]
19
Shankar' which contained details about the nexus between criminals and police
officers. The Supreme Court framed the questions in these terms: "Whether a
citizen of this country can prevent another person from writing his life story or
biography? Does such unauthorised writing infringe the citizen's right to privacy?
Whether the freedom of press guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) entitles the press to
publish such unauthorised account of a citizen's life and activities and if so to what
extent and in what circumstances?" While answering the above questions, a bench
of two judges of the Supreme Court, for the first time, directly linked the right to
privacy to Article 21 of the Constitution but at the same time excluded matters of
public record from being protected under this 'Right to Privacy'. After analysing
Supreme Court orders and some American decisions the Bench the Supreme Court
held in Paragraph 9:
Union Public Service Commission vs R.K. Jain on 6 November, 2012
37 Union Public Service Commission v R K Jain (LPA 618 of 2012) https://indiankanoon.org/doc/15738113/