Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.36 seconds)
State vs . Ramanand Chaudhary on 10 March, 2015 cites

Ajmer Singh vs State Of Haryana on 15 February, 2010

In Ajmer Singh v. State of Haryana 2010 (2) SCR 785, the Supreme Court held that it is not always possible to find independent witnesses at all the places at all the times. The obligation to join public witness is not absolute. The Supreme Court held that in such circumstances, the Court will have to appreciate the relevant evidence to determine whether the evidence of a police officer is believable so as to place implicit reliance thereon. In the instant matter, there are no cogent and valid reasons to discard/suspect the testimony of the traffic police officials who had no prior acquaintance with the accused and who did not nurture any grievance against him.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 657 - H L Dattu - Full Document
1