Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.26 seconds)

M/S Emerging India Real Assets P Limited vs Kamer Chand on 9 February, 2016

If a marketing agency sells out a project, for which, no approvals/sanctions have been granted by the Govt. Authorities, the said agency has to face the music and consequences of duping the gullible buyers, of their hard-earned money. In the public notice, it has specifically been mentioned by the GMADA that respondent no.2 and appellant no.1 are the sister concern. It is also apparent on record that before appellant no.1 started marketing the project, not even an application has been filed by respondent no.2, to get approval/sanction from the competent authorities, to launch the project. The information supplied vide letter dated 26.08.2014, referred to above, clearly states that not even a single application qua granting sanction to the project, has been received and dealt with, by the Competent Authority. In connivance with each other, the appellants and respondent no.2 committed a criminal offence of cheating. As per established law, builder cannot sell its property, unless and until proper approvals/sanctions have been obtained by it, from the Competent Authorities. It appears from the reading of documents on record that instead of selling a unit in a project, respondent no.2 in a very arbitrary manner, sold its share in a joint land measuring approx. 3807 acres, bearing hadbast No.326, Khewat No.92, Khatauni no.254-352, at Village Mirzapur, District Mohali, Punjab. There is nothing on record that said land was ever partitioned.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 102 - Full Document

Dlf Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. vs D.S. Dhanda Etc. Etc. on 10 May, 2019

It certainly amounts to unfair trade practices and also amounts to deficiency in service. The complainant had been left in limbo for many years without being sure whether he would get the residential plot or not.  After waiting for considerable time, the complainant had opted for refund of his money and, therefore, findings of the State Commission on this count cannot be said to be suffering with any illegality or infirmity.    It is a settled proposition of law as held by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Dhanda's case ( supra ) that where compensation in terms of interest is awarded, no compensation under any other head should be granted. Compensation awarded towards mental agony etc. is, therefore, quashed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 143 - H Gupta - Full Document
1