Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.22 seconds)Section 7 in The Guardians And Wards Act, 1890 [Entire Act]
Zynab Bi Alias Bibijan vs Mohammad Ghouse Mohideen on 17 May, 1951
23. An authority on all fours, which is against this view, has been cited on behalf of the respondent, being Zynab Bi v. Mohd. Ghouse Mohideen, AIR 1952 Mad 284.
Article 352 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Musammat Ulfat Bibi vs Bafati on 28 March, 1927
It was also pointed out therein following Ulfat Bibi v. Bafati, AIR 1927 All 581 that the right of the mother, who had the custody of the child, went side by side with the father who was the natural lawful guardian of the child.
Section 10 in The Guardians And Wards Act, 1890 [Entire Act]
Section 19 in The Guardians And Wards Act, 1890 [Entire Act]
Mt. Sakina Begam vs Malka Ara Begum on 20 October, 1947
20. No doubt, in two other cases of OUT High Court, namely Haidri Begum v. Jawwad Ali Shah, 1934 All LJ 399 = (AIR 1934 All 722) and Mt. Sakina Begam v. Malka Ara Begam, AIR 1948 All 198, the mother was given preference over father in the matter of appointment as guardian of her minor children, but these cases were for the appointment of guardian under Section 7 of the Guardians and Wards Act and not under Section 25 for the restoration of the custody of the minors.
Mt. Haidri Begum vs Jawwad Ali Shah on 5 January, 1934
In fact Haidri Begum's case was under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent under which the power similar to that under Section 7 of the Guardians and Wards Act was exercised.
1