Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.37 seconds)

Raj Kumar Singh @ Raju @ Batya vs State Of Rajasthan on 6 May, 2013

Hence, it can be held that no fact was discovered within the meaning of section 27 Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Further, according to FSL report Ex.PW-13/A, no blood was detected on the said blanket. Therefore, the recoveries shown at the instance of the accused are highly doubtful in nature. Therefore, in view of the judgment Raj Kumar Singh (supra), statement made by the accused in reply to the question no.8 and 25 of his statement u/s 313 CrPC that he got recovered the said blanket and the said stone is of no benefit of the prosecution.
Supreme Court of India Cites 40 - Cited by 341 - B S Chauhan - Full Document
1   2 Next