Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.26 seconds)
Gitaben Bharatbhai Bhuria vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 7 April, 2016 cites

K.D. Vohra vs Kamleshbhai Gobarbhai Patel on 11 December, 2002

I have heard both the learned advocates. It is not in dispute   that   appointments   of   the   petitioners   are   ad­hoc   and   till   GPSC   selected   candidate   is   available.   It   is   true   that   the   petitioners  were  continued   in  service   and  no   attempt   was   made by the department to fill up the posts through GPSC   selected candidates, however, this point now no longer open   to challenge as Division Bench of this Court in  K.D.Vohra   V. Kamleshbhai Gobarbhai Patel  reported   in  2003  (2)   GLR 1342 has observed as under in paragraph 26.
Gujarat High Court Cites 76 - Cited by 42 - Full Document

Court In The Case Of Secretary, State Of ... vs . Uma on 9 April, 2015

7. As  and when, the respondents receive such representation   from the petitioners, it is directed to the respondent ý State   Authority to consider the case of petitioners and examine the   grievance voiced in the representation in light of the decision   given by Apex Court in case of Secretary, State of Karnataka   and Ors. v. Uma Devi reported in (2006) 4 SCC 1 and pass   appropriate reasoned order in accordance with law within a   period   of   four   months   from   the   date   of   receiving   such   representation   from   the   petitioners   and   communicate   the   same to the petitioners immediately.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 1 - Cited by 2142 - Full Document
1