Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.21 seconds)
Union Of India vs Kahnei Charan Biswal on 12 September, 2017 cites

P.K. Ramachandran vs State Of Kerala & Anr on 19 September, 1997

In P.K. Ramachandran v. State of Kerala, AIR 1998 SC 2276, the apex Court while reversing the order passed by the High Court which had condoned 565 days' delay in filing an appeal by the State against the decree of the Sub-Court in an arbitration application, observed that Law of limitation may harshly affect a particular party but it has to be applied with all its rigour when the statute so prescribes and the courts have no power to extend the period of limitation on equitable grounds.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 733 - K Venkataswami - Full Document

Vedabai @ Vaijayanatabai Baburao Patil vs Shantaram Baburao Patil And Ors on 20 July, 2001

In Vedabai v. Shantaram Baburao Patil, AIR 2001 SC 2582, the Court observed that a distinction must be made between a case where the delay is inordinate and a case where the delay is of few days and whereas in the former case the consideration of prejudice to the other side will be a relevant factor, in the latter case no such consideration arises.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 655 - Full Document

State Of Nagaland vs Lipok Ao & Ors on 1 April, 2005

In State of Nagaland v. Lipok Ao, AIR 2005 SC 2191, the Court referred to several precedents on the subject and observed that the proof of "sufficient cause" is a condition precedent for exercise of discretion vested in the Court. What counts is not the length of the delay but the sufficiency of the cause and shortness of the delay is one of the circumstances to be taken into account in using the discretion. The Court also took cognizance of the usual bureaucratic delays which take place in the functioning of the State and its agencies/instrumentalities and observed:
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 1149 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs Nripen Sarma on 15 February, 2011

In a recent decision in Union of India v. Nripen Sarma, AIR 2011 SC 1237, the matter came up against the order passed by the High Court condoning the delay in filing the appeal by the appellant Union of India. The High Court refused to condone the delay on the ground that the appellant Union of India took their own sweet time to reach the conclusion whether the judgment should be appealed or not. The High Court also expressed its anguish and distress with the way the State conducts the cases regularly in filing the appeal after the same became operational and barred by limitation."
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 51 - Full Document
1