Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.18 seconds)Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 25 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Surender @ Babli vs State(Gnct)Of Delhi on 28 July, 2011
In Surender @ Babli v. State (GNCT of Delhi) Crl.
Appeal No.1547/2010 decided by Supreme Court on
28072011, the facts were that the fired bullet recovered from dead
body matched with the revolver recovered at the instance of the
accused. Hon'ble High Court of Delhi had acquitted the two accused
who were not identified by the complainant but had convicted the
accused on whose instance revolver was recovered. The Supreme
Court reversed the finding of the High Court on the ground that bullet
State v.Surender etc. 182/09 31 of32
was recovered from body on 08022001, revolver was recovered at
the instance of accused on 28022001 but the bullet and revolver
were sent to FSL on 03042001 i.e. after elapse of one month and
three days. Another defect in the cited case was that there was
contradiction about preparation of seizure memo of the pistol. Two
prosecution witnesses had stated that it was written by a person X
and some other PWs had stated it was written by Y. In the case in
hand the defect was pointed out by FSL and as per PW5, that
defect was in seal. So the cited case is fully applicable on the facts
of the present case. Hence prosecution has failed to prove its case
even against accused Surender and Ashwani.
Mrinal Das & Ors vs State Of Tripura on 5 September, 2011
In Mrinal Das & Ors. v. State of Tripura (2011) 9 SCC 479
the Supreme Court held as under:
Section 27 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
1