cites: 1725911

1 - 5 of 5 (0.26 seconds)

Har Prasad And Ors. vs Hori Lal And Anr. on 1 November, 1928 cites

Ram Bilas And Anr. vs Lal Bahadur And Ors. on 3 April, 1908

314 : 8 A.L.J. 61 and Rama Bilas v. Lal Bahadur 30 A. 311 : A.W.N. (1908) 112 : 5 A.L, J.456 : 4 M.L.T. 169 which should militate against the view laid down in Faiyaz Ali v. Rekhab Das 61 Ind. Cas.

Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 17 - Full Document

Saiyid Faiyaz Ali vs Rekhab Das And Ors. on 11 December, 1920

314 : 8 A.L.J. 61 and Rama Bilas v. Lal Bahadur 30 A. 311 : A.W.N. (1908) 112 : 5 A.L, J.456 : 4 M.L.T. 169 which should militate against the view laid down in Faiyaz Ali v. Rekhab Das 61 Ind. Cas.

Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Syed Tajammul Husain vs Banwari Lal And Ors. on 19 June, 1925

24 : 19 A.L.J. 104 and Tajammul Husain v. Banwari Lal 88 Ind. Cas 752 : 23 A.L.J. 932 : L.R. 6 A. 179 Rev. : A.I.R. 1986 All. 47 : 48 A, 77. In the later cases, the instances were numerous, (the two earlier cases do not show how many instances were brought to the notice of the Court) and it was said that in the circumstances it was for the zemindars to explain how the transfers came to be brought about if no custom existed.

Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

Section 13 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 1213

Muhammad Usman And Ors. vs Babu on 10 December, 1910

In my view there is nothing in what was said in the case of Muhammad Usman v. Babu 9 Ind. Cas.

Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Ram Bilas And Anr. vs Lal Bahadur And Ors. on 3 April, 1908

Saiyid Faiyaz Ali vs Rekhab Das And Ors. on 11 December, 1920

Syed Tajammul Husain vs Banwari Lal And Ors. on 19 June, 1925

Section 13 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]

Muhammad Usman And Ors. vs Babu on 10 December, 1910