Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.28 seconds)
Dr. R.S. Sohane vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 January, 2017 cites

Jagdish Prasad Sharma Etc.Etc vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 17 July, 2013

Even though, we are conscious of the fact that if the statutory provisions i.e. Statute 28 of the College Code and the U. G. C. Regulation is not considered and the writ appeal of Dr. Arun Kumar (Supra) is dismissed, it is not necessary to refer the matter to a Larger Bench but we find that in the case of Dr. Arun Kumar (supra), it has been held that the law laid down in the case of Jagdish Prasad Sharma (supra) will not apply.
Supreme Court of India Cites 35 - Cited by 268 - A Kabir - Full Document

Suresh Chand Jain vs Secretary State Of M.P. And 2 Ors. on 27 June, 2016

However, Shri Patne points out that while deciding the writ petition i.e. W. P. No. 4842/16 (s) Dr. Suresh Chandra Jain (supra) and while dismissing the writ petition identical in nature, the Gwalior Bench on 29/03/16 in W. P. No. 5616/10 (s) has not taken note of the amendment to the College Code 28 which was brought into force by amendment in the year 2004 and inviting our attention to the following amendments made in the College Code ^^leUo; lfefr ds fu.kZ; fnukad 07-01-2004 esa ifjfu;e 28 dh dafMdk 26 esa fuEukuqlkj la'kks/ku fd;k x;k gS dh lwpuk xzg.k djus ij fopkj fd;k x;kA v'kkaldh; egkfo|ky;ksa ds izkpk;Z] f'k{kdksa vkSj deZpkfj;ksa dh lsokfuo`fRr vk;q 'kkldh; egkfo|ky;ksa ds izkpk;Z] f'k{kdksa vkSj deZpkfj;ksa ds leku j[kk tkuk mfpr gksxkA^^ Shri Patne argued that an error has been committed both by the Writ Court and the Writ Appellate Court.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1