Ashok Kumar & Others vs Sita Ram on 19 April, 2001
7. Counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble the Apex Court in Ashok Kumar and Ors. v. Sita Ram 2001 (2) ARC 1 : 2001 (3) AWC 1997 (SC), wherein it has been held that finding of fact recorded by the court below should not be in terfered with by High Court in writ jurisdiction unless there is a manifest error of law on face of record or the finding is patently perverse Explanation (1) to Section 21 (1)(a) of the Act in unequivocal terms provides that where the tenant or any member of his family who has been normally residing with or is wholly dependent on him has built or has otherwise acquired in a vacant state or has got vacated after acquisition a residential building in the same city, municipality, notified area or town area, no objection by the tenant against an application under this subsection shall be entertained.