Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.24 seconds)The Limitation Act, 1963
Shashikant Agrawal vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 20 July, 2016
On reading the whole judgment in the case of Shashikant Agrawal
Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others (supra) it is found that the exemption
from the limitation was not claimed by the party concerned under the
provisions of Section 14 of the Indian Limitation Act and it has also been
observed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in catena of decisions that the
cause of action is different from the cause of arbitration.
Consolidated Engg.Enterprises vs Principal Secy. Irrigation Deptt. & Ors on 3 April, 2008
In the case of Shakti Tubes Limited through Director Vs. State of
Bihar and others (supra) the case of Consolidated Engineering
Enterprises vs. Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department & Ors (supra)
has not been discussed even then the same principle has been laid down
14
that provisions of Section 14 of the Limitation Act shall be applicable to the
proceeding arising under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,
and the ratio laid down in the case of Gulbarga University v. Mallikarjun S.
Kodagali, (2008) 13 SCC 539 was followed.
Section 5 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
M/S Shakti Tubes Ltd.Tr.Director vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 16 December, 2008
In the case of Shakti Tubes Limited through Director Vs. State of
Bihar and others (supra) the case of Consolidated Engineering
Enterprises vs. Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department & Ors (supra)
has not been discussed even then the same principle has been laid down
14
that provisions of Section 14 of the Limitation Act shall be applicable to the
proceeding arising under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,
and the ratio laid down in the case of Gulbarga University v. Mallikarjun S.
Kodagali, (2008) 13 SCC 539 was followed.
The Companies Act, 1956
Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Union Of India And Ors vs West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. & Anr on 5 February, 2004
In the case of Union of India and others Vs. West Coast Paper
Mills Ltd. and another (supra) Hon'ble the Supreme Court has held in
paragraphs No.23 and 41 that:-