Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.25 seconds)

Hoda Sk vs State Of West Bengal on 3 January, 2020

in counterfeit notes. As discussed above, evidence on record unequivocally shows the appellant and co-accused were apprehended while carrying a large volume of counterfeit notes in a public place. Thus, transportation of counterfeit notes by the appellant is clearly established. Facts of the instant 9 case are clearly distinguishable from that in Hoda Sk. vs. State of West Bengal1. In that case, no charge for trafficking of counterfeit notes had been framed by the trial court and on such premise this court was of the view the conviction under section 489B IPC on the score of trafficking could not be upheld. On the other hand, in the present case appellant had been charged of trafficking in counterfeit currency notes. Thus, conviction of the appellant under section 489B IPC does not call for interference.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 6 - Cited by 5 - J Bagchi - Full Document
1