Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (1.07 seconds)Section 1 in The Copyright Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Copyright Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Macmillan And Company Ltd. vs K. And J. Cooper on 14 December, 1923
The Judicial Committee in the case of Macmillan & Company
Limited v. K. and J. Cooper(2) while pointing out the
essential ingredients of the infringement of copyright Lord
Atkinson observed as follows:-
C. Cunniah And Co. By Partners M. ... vs Balraj And Co. By Partners S. Rajaratnam ... on 4 February, 1959
In the case of C. Cunniah and Co. v. Balraj & Co.(2)
the Court applying the test of resemblance observed as
follows:-
K.R. Venugopala Sarma vs Sangu Ganesan on 3 November, 1971
K. R. Venugopalan Sarma v. Sangu Ganesan(3) was a case
of infringement of copyright in picture and it was held that
an infringement of the copyright was complete even though
the reproduction was not exact, but the effect on the mind
by study of the two pictures was that the respondent's
picture was nothing but a copy of the plaintiff's picture.
The Court while applying the various tests Observed as
follows:-
The Daily Calendar Supplying Bureau, ... vs The United Concern on 16 January, 1964
To the same effect is an earlier decision of the
Division Bench of the Madras High Court in the case of The
Daily Calendar Supplying Bureau, Sivakasi v. The United
Concern(4) where the Court observed as follows
(1) 60 I.A. 26.
S.K. Dutt vs Law Book Co. And Ors. on 8 December, 1953
Similarly in the case of S.K. Dutt v. Law Book Co. &
ors.(l) it was held that in order to be an infringement of a
man's copyright there must be a substantial infringement of
the work. A mere fair dealing with any work falls outside
the mischief of the Copyright Act.
Mohini Mohan Singh And Ors. vs Sita Nath Basak on 22 January, 1930
In the case of Mohini Mohan Singh & Ors. v. Sita Nath
Basak(3) a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court while
laying down the necessary concomitants of a colorable
imitation Mukherji, J. Observed as follows:-
1