Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (1.00 seconds)
Baby Devi(Dec Thr Lr ... vs Nafees Khan(New India) on 2 April, 2026 cites

Abdul Samad (D) Thr. Lrs. vs Hafees Khan (D) Thr. His Legal Heirs on 26 September, 2014

(D x 12) 6 Multiplier (E) 15 7 Total loss of dependency (Rs. 1,30,788/- x 15) = DxE=F Rs.19,61,820/- 8 Medical Expenses (G) Nil 9 Compensation for loss of love Nil and affection (H) 10 Compensation for loss of Rs. 53,240/- consortium (I) to the petitioner 11 Compensation for loss of Rs. 19,965/- MACT No.191/2025 RUCHIKA SINGLA Baby Devi (Dec.) through LRs vs. Nafees Khan and Ors. Digitally signed by RUCHIKA SINGLA Date: 2026.04.02 Page 29 of 35 14:25:07 +0530 Estate (J) 12 Compensation for funeral Rs. 19,965/- expenses (K) 13 Total Compensation (F+I+J+K) Rs. 20,54,990/- 14 Rate of Interest Awarded 9% 15 Interest amount upto the date of Rs. 2,00,150/- award w.e.f. 03.03.2025 till realization 16 Total amount including interest Rs. 22,55,140/- 17 Award amount released As per paragraph Nos. 51 & 52 18 Award amount kept in FDRs As per paragraph No. 52 19 Mode of disbursement of the As per paragraph Nos. 51 & 52 award amount to the claimant(s) 20 Next Date of compliance of the 02.05.2026 award LIABILITY:
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur And Ors. on 30 June, 2020

41. However, in the case of United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur 2020 SCC Online SC 410 the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed that there is no justification to award compensation towards loss of love and affection as a separate head. The relevant portion of the observations are reproduced as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 1453 - I Malhotra - Full Document

Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009

In light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Sarla Verma (Smt) & Ors. vs. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., (2009) 6 SCC 121, and United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Satinder Kaur alias Satwinder Kaur & Ors., (2021) 11 SCC 780 , out of the above amount so assessed, 1/2 amount has to be deducted on account of personal and living expenses as the deceased had only one dependent. So, in this matter, monthly loss of dependency would come out to be Rs. 10,899/- (1/2 of Rs. 21,798/-). This needs to be multiplied by 12 to workout multiplicand/annual loss of dependency. Hence, multiplicand for this matter would be Rs. 1,30,788/- ( Rs. 10,899/- x 12).
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 20141 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Niru @ Niharika on 7 April, 2022

2026.04.02 14:25:12 +0530 MACT No.191/2025 Baby Devi (Dec.) through LRs vs. Nafees Khan and Ors. Page 30 of 35 deposit a sum of Rs.20,54,990/- (Rupees Twenty Lakhs Fifty Four Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety Only) along with interest @ 9% from the date of filing of DAR i.e. w.e.f. 03.03.2025 till realization with the Civil Nazir of this Tribunal within 30 days under intimation to the claimants, failing which the respondents shall be liable to pay interest @12% per annum for the period of delay beyond 30 days. Reliance placed on case titled as Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Niru @ Niharika & Ors. SLP no. 22136 of 2024 decided on 14.07.2025 by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. ... vs Meera Devi & Ors. on 16 February, 2021

20. Reliance is also being placed upon the judgment of Hon'ble Delhi High Court in case Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Meera Devi, 2021 LawSuit (Del) wherein it was held that "......in view of Delhi Motor Accident Claim Tribunal Rules, 2008, contents of DAR has to be presumed to be correct and read in evidence without formal proof of the same unless proof to the contrary was produced."
Delhi High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 10 - S Sachdeva - Full Document
1   2 3 Next