Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.53 seconds)M/S. New Horizons Limited And Another vs Union Of India And Others on 15 October, 1993
"We must, however, remind ourselves that even if a
small part of cause of action arises within the territorial
jurisdiction of the High Court, the same by itself may
not be considered to be a determinative factor
compelling the High Court to decide the matter on
merit. In appropriate cases, the Court may refuse to
exercise its discretionary jurisdiction by invoking the
doctrine of forum conveniens. (See Bhagar Singh Bagga
v. Dewan Jagbir Sawhany, AIR 1941 Cal 670; Mandal
Jalal v. Madanlal, (1945) 49 CWN 357; Bharat Coking
Coal Limited v. M/s. Jharia Talkies and Cold Storage
Pvt. Ltd. (1997) CWN 122; S. S. Jain and Co. and
another v. Union of India and others (1994) CHN 445;
M/s. New Horizon Ltd. v. Union of India, AIR 1994 Delhi
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 20 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Central Excise Act, 1944 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Central Excise Act, 1944 [Entire Act]
M/S. S. Jain & Company vs Union Of India & Ors on 25 November, 2008
"We must, however, remind ourselves that even if a
small part of cause of action arises within the territorial
jurisdiction of the High Court, the same by itself may
not be considered to be a determinative factor
compelling the High Court to decide the matter on
merit. In appropriate cases, the Court may refuse to
exercise its discretionary jurisdiction by invoking the
doctrine of forum conveniens. (See Bhagar Singh Bagga
v. Dewan Jagbir Sawhany, AIR 1941 Cal 670; Mandal
Jalal v. Madanlal, (1945) 49 CWN 357; Bharat Coking
Coal Limited v. M/s. Jharia Talkies and Cold Storage
Pvt. Ltd. (1997) CWN 122; S. S. Jain and Co. and
another v. Union of India and others (1994) CHN 445;
M/s. New Horizon Ltd. v. Union of India, AIR 1994 Delhi
Section 10F in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
1