Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.24 seconds)Section 332 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Deputy Director Of Collegiate ... vs S. Nagoor Meera on 24 February, 1995
In the case of Deputy Director of Collegiate
Education (Administration), Madras v. S. Nagoor Meera
reported in AIR 1995 SC 1364, the Hon'ble Supreme Court
held as below :-
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 324 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 325 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Union Of India And Another vs Tulsiram Patel And Others on 11 July, 1985
From afore quoted judgment observations made
by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Tulsi Ram Patel's case, it is
evident that the Court was of the view that the mention
made by the disciplinary authority in the order of
compulsory retirement about the employee's conviction for
the offence under Section 332 I.P.C. and the nature of
offence committed was sufficient indication of proper
application of mind to the facts of the case. The order was
held to be eloquent and self speaking. The Hon'ble Apex
Court went to the extent of saying that the conduct of the
employee (who had been convicted for the offence under
Section 332 I.P.C.) merited penalty of dismissal from
Government service and by imposing upon him, only the
consequence of compulsory retirement, the disciplinary
authority had acted leniently. In this background, the said
8
S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5747/2015
Shamsher Khan. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
judgment also is of no help to the petitioner.