Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.25 seconds)
Ravi Rastogi vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 20 October, 2022 cites

Surinder Kumar Khanna vs Intelligence Officer Directorate Of ... on 31 July, 2018

7.1.2. In view of the above, I am inclined to accept Ld. Prosecutor‟s submissions that it is not merely the disclosure statement of the accused no. 8 Omkar Nath Tripathi on the basis of which, the petitioner‟s interrogation is being sought. Reliance placed upon the judgment in „Surinder Kumar Khanna vs. Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (2018) 8 SCC 271 by Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is of no assistance to the petitioner. More so, as the observations that the conviction (under NDPS Act) can not be based merely on the basis of Signature Not Verified Bail Appli.3006/2022 Page 9 of 11 Digitally Signed By:GEETA JOSHI Signing Date:04.11.2022 15:33:43 Neutral Citation Number:2022/DHC/004625 confessional statement of co-accused has no applicability to the present situation of consideration of bail application.
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 218 - U U Lalit - Full Document

Omkar Nath Tripathi vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 14 October, 2022

3.4. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner further argued that the accused no. 8 Omkar Nath Tripathi, who was named in the FIR, had challenged the said order and was granted interim protection against arrest by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court of India vide order dated 14.10.2022 in SLP (Crl.) No. 9648/2022, titled as „Omkar Nath Tripathi vs. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.‟ Ld. counsel also submitted that the petitioner stands on a better footing than accused Omkar Nath Tripathi. Therefore, he be either granted interim protection or be granted anticipatory bail for the above reasons. He is still ready to extend cooperation, if protection is provided to him.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - A S Bopanna - Full Document

Deepak Talwar vs Assistant Director, Enforcement ... on 18 February, 2019

In support, Ld. Counsel placed reliance upon the judgment dated 04.04.2019 in the case of Deepak Talwar vs. Assistant Director Enforcement Directorate, in WP (Crl.) 385/2019, pleading that in that case, bail was granted as the accused was implicated on the basis of disclosure statement of co- accused, who made different statements on different points of time. Same is the situation in the present case.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - S Mridul - Full Document
1