Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.31 seconds)The Bengal Money-Lenders Act, 1940
Section 8 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
21 Auto India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors vs Incred Financial Services Ltd on 19 June, 2023
(iv) Auto India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Incred Financial Services
Limited (CRR 443 of 2020, decided on 19.06.2023).
Pratibha Rani vs Suraj Kumar & Anr on 12 March, 1985
In this context he relied upon the judgment of
Pratibha Rani Vs. Suraj Kumar reported in (1985) 2 SCC 370.
Accordingly Mr. Mukherjee submits that quasing of the entire proceeding at
such an embryonic stage would impede the course of justice and would
cause great injustice to the opposite party, if the prayer for quahsing is
allowed and as such he pryaed for dismissal of the said application.
Section 126 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Hriday Ranjan Prasad Gupta vs The State Of Bihar on 24 March, 2021
In Hridoy Ranjan Prasad Verma Vs. State of Bihar reported in
(2000) 4 SCC 168 the Apex Court reiterated that while determining such
question it has to be kept in mind that the distinction between mere breach
of contract and the offence of cheating is a fine one. It depends upon the
intention of the accused at the time of inducement which may be judged by
his subsequent conduct, though for this, subsequent conduct is not the
sole test. Mere breach of contract cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution
for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention shown right at the
beginning of the transaction.