Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.24 seconds)
E.V. Chinnaiah vs State Of Andhra Pradesh & Ors on 5 November, 2004 cites

Indra Sawhney Etc. Etc vs Union Of India And Others, Etc. Etc. on 16 November, 1992

It was also argued that further classification of the backward class is permissible in view of the judgment of this Court in the case of Indra Sawhney vs. Union of India & Ors. 1992 (Supp.3) SCC 217, the principles laid down therein was applicable even to the Scheduled Castes. It was also argued that the enactment was in the form of affirmative action to fulfil the constitutional objects and the courts should not interfere in such efforts of the Legislature. Reliance was also placed on the recommendations made by the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and in its Report a further argument addressed on behalf of the respondents is that even if some castes in the Presidential List of Scheduled Castes get excluded from the benefit of reservation made by the State that by itself would not take the caste out of the List of Scheduled Castes because they will continue to be entitled to other benefits that are being provided by the State to the Scheduled Castes.
Supreme Court of India Cites 136 - Cited by 1429 - B P Reddy - Full Document
1   2 Next