Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.33 seconds)

The Principal Commssioner Of Customs ... vs Unison Clearing Pvt. Ltd on 19 April, 2018

5. Not without reason, Learned Counsel for appellant also drew attention to the inordinate delay in concluding the inquiry proceedings, for reasons not attributable to the appellant, that should, of itself, be justification for setting aside the impugned order. According to him, the inquiry ordered on 12th January 2015 was concluded only on 27th July 2021 to be followed by revocation in order of 10th December 2021 and that, in confronting this legal hurdle, the licencing authority had failed to appreciate the spirit of the judgement of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in Principal Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai v. Unison Clearing P Ltd [2018 (3610 ELT 321 (Bom)] even while indulging in selective culling therefrom to obfuscate the absence of justification for the delay. Clearly, there is a breach of time lines without adequate explanation thereof to which we may advert after examining the issue on merit as submitted by Learned Counsel.
Bombay High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 10 - B Dangre - Full Document
1