Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.20 seconds)Section 34 in The Orissa Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation of Land Act, 1972 [Entire Act]
Section 91 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Smt. Binapani Sethi And Anr. vs Sri Bijay Kumar Sahoo And Ors. on 23 April, 1996
22. In reply to the first question, the learned Single Judge had
referred to the recitals in the Sale Deed available on record. Further
in the context of Question No.1, the learned Single Judge had
referred to a judgment of this Court in the case of Smt. Binapani
Sethi (supra), wherein it has been held that the land sold separately
and collectively measured less than one acre, which is the minimum
W.A. Nos.186 & 187 of 2010 Page 14 of 18
area prescribed for the district of Cuttack, can be sold without
permission of the Tahasildar. Therefore, there had been a clear
contravention of Section 34 of the OCH & PFL Act. Hence, the
Collector was justified in his conclusion that the transactions were
void.
1