Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.40 seconds)

M/S Dundlod Shikshan Sansthan & Anr. vs Union Of India And Ors. on 28 July, 2015

"3.5. We have heard rival contentions, perused the material available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below. We have also gone through the case laws relied upon by the Id. Counsel. We find merit into the contention of Id. Counsel that he 8 ITA No.2039/Del/2018 jurisdictional High Court has decided the validity of section 234E, but has not decide the issue of power of AO for levy of tax under section 234E in the judgment rendered in the case of M/ s. Dundlod Shikshan Sansthan and Others (supra) as relied by Id. CIT (A).
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 14 - Cited by 68 - S Ambwani - Full Document

Commr.Of Income Tax-I vs M/S Vatika Township Pvt.Ltd. on 29 October, 2014

We have also gone through the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Vatika Township Pvt. Ltd. (supra) wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court has discussed in detail the general principle of concerning retrospectively and held that unless contrary intention appears, a legislation is presumed not to have a retrospective operation. Respectfully following the above judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court and Hon'ble Karnataka High Court, we set aside the order of Id. CIT (A) and direct the AO to drop the demand raised of Rs. 4,200/- u/s 234E on statements processed u/s 200A before 01.06.2015. Thus grounds raised by the assessee are allowed."
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 20 - Cited by 428 - Full Document
1   2 Next