Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 55 (1.23 seconds)Section 83 in The Representation of the People Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Section 86 in The Representation of the People Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Section 100 in The Representation of the People Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Azhar Hussain vs Rajiv Gandhi on 25 April, 1986
(1972) 2 SCR 742] and Azhar Hussain v. Rajiv Gandhi
[1986 Supp SCC 315 : AIR 1986 SC 1253 : 1986 All LJ
625] . Allegations contained in sub-paras 1, 2 and 3 of
para 53(1)(E) raise a grievance that though the
appellant had not appointed any counting agent but
still certain persons acted as his counting agents and
the Returning Officer did not hold any inquiry into his
complaint. Sub-para 4 states that in the Amethi
Constituency, there was fear psychosis and “it looked
as if the police and other government officials wanted
to help Rajiv Gandhi”. Sub-paras 5 to 8 refer to certain
illegalities and irregularities alleged to have been
committed by certain persons on the polling day in
helping voters to cast their votes and it further alleged
that some persons cast votes 100 to 200 times and
their signatures were not obtained. These allegations
do not make out any charge of corrupt practice within
the provisions of Section 123(7) of the Act. As regards
para 53(1)(G) it purports to allege a corrupt practice
under Section 123(6) of the Act on the ground that
Rajiv Gandhi spent Rs 3,15,500 in excess of the
amount permitted under the law. We have already
discussed this matter earlier.”
Section 87 in The Representation of the People Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Section 81 in The Representation of the People Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
The Representation Of The People Act, 1950
Udhav Singh vs Madhav Rao Scindia on 10 October, 1975
In Udhav Singh v. Madhav Rao Scindia [(1977) 1
SCC 511 : AIR 1976 SC 744 : (1976) 2 SCR 246] this
http://www.judis.nic.in
64
Court held that failure to plead even a single material
fact leads to an incomplete cause of action and
incomplete allegations of such a charge are liable to be
struck off under Order VI Rule 16, Code of Civil
Procedure. If the petition is based solely on those
allegations which suffer from lack of material facts, the
petition is liable to be summarily rejected for want of a
cause of action.