Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.85 seconds)
Rohit Atmarambhai Patel & vs State Of Gujarat & 3 on 15 July, 2015 cites

Gujarat State Dy. Executive Engineers' ... vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 10 May, 1994

5. What   is   a   waiting   list,   has   been   succinctly   explained   by   the  Supreme Court in the case of 'Gujarat State Deputy Executive Engineers  Association Vs. State of Gujarat'  reported in  1994 (Supp 2) SCC 591.  Two questions fell for the consideration of the Supreme Court i.e. (i)  Could the waiting list be treated as a source of recruitment from which  candidates  may be drawn as and when necessary? and (ii) How long  could it operate.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 220 - R M Sahai - Full Document

Manoj Manu & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 12 August, 2013

In one of the recent pronouncements of the Supreme Court in the  case   of  'Manoj   Manu   And   Another   Vs.   Union   of   India   And   Others'  reported in (2013) 12 SCC 171, the same issue regarding the operating  of   the   waiting­list   has   been   explained.   The   Supreme   Court   took   into  consideration   two   situations;   (A)   where   candidates   who   had   initially  joined, but subsequently resigned/quit or were promoted, thus resulting  in creation of vacancies again and (B) where out of the recommended  candidates   some   candidates   do   not   join   at   all.   The   Supreme   Court  clarified the position by explaining that it is only in Situation (A) that  the recruiting authority may be justified in not forwarding names from  the   reserved/supplementary   list   as   there   is   culmination   of   the  recruitment   process   with   exhaustion   of   the   notified   vacancies   and  Page 5 of 8 7 of 10 C/SCA/16534/2014 ORDER vacancies   arising   thereafter   should   be   filled­up   by   fresh   examination.  However, in Situation (B), non­forwarding of names from the waiting  list may not be justified, especially when there is a specific requisition by  the appointing authority.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 167 - A K Sikri - Full Document

Neelima Shangla Ph.D. Candidate vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 17 September, 1986

10. We are conscious of the legal position that merely because the   name  of a candidate  finds  place  in the select list, it would  not give   him/her   indefeasible   right   to   get   appointment   as   well.   It  is   always   open to the Government not to fill up all vacancies. However, there has   to be a valid reason for adopting such a course of  action. This legal   position has been narrated by this Court in Ms.Neelima Shangla vs.   State of Haryana (1986) 3 SCR 785.  In that case:
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 458 - O C Reddy - Full Document
1