Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.33 seconds)The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 25 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Section 39 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Pawan Kumar vs The Delhi Administration on 17 August, 1987
c) All the witnesses are police officials. The IOs have not
made any public person as witness in this case. PW4 ASI Rajesh
Kumar admitted that notice was not served to any public witness.
The non-joining of the public witness creates doubt on the story
of the prosecution, as held in Pawan Kumar vs. Delhi
Administration, 1987 CC 585, Delhi High Court. Also, no
reason as to why no public witness could be found has been put
forth by the prosecution. All the witnesses examined are police
State vs. Sanjeev Kumar FIR No. 03/2018, PS: Saket Page 7 of 10
witnesses. This casts a doubt about the sincere efforts made by
the IO to join independent witnesses.
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 294 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1