Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (1.36 seconds)The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Section 10 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
Section 166 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 165 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Oriental Ins.Co.Ltd vs Dyamavva & Ors on 5 February, 2013
8. Per contra, Ms.Niyati Juthani, learned counsel for
defendant No.2 has supported the impugned judgment and
award and has stated that the appellants are not entitled
to double compensation as they have already availed
alternative by filing Motor Accident Claim Petition, which
is already disposed of. It was further contended that the
judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Oriental
Insurance Company Limited (supra), as relied upon by the
Page 4 of 10
HC-NIC Page 4 of 10 Created On Sun Aug 20 04:39:23 IST 2017
C/FA/1998/2017 ORDER
appellants, is not applicable as in the instant case, the
appellants themselves have opted for the alternative,
which is provided under Section 167 of the MV Act and
learned Labour Court has committed no error in coming to
the conclusion that the petition filed by the appellants
was not maintainable and therefore, submitted that no
interference is called for.