Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.27 seconds)Ravinder Kaur vs Ashok Kumar & Anr on 15 October, 2003
In Ravinder Kaur v. Ashok Kumar & Anr., 2003 AIR SCW 7153, the Hon'ble Apex Court has held:-
T. Arivandandam vs T. V. Satyapal & Another on 14 October, 1977
In T. Arivandandam v. T.V. Satyapal and another, reported in AIR 1977 SC 2421, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held:
Rajappa Hanamantha Ranoji vs Sri Mahadev Channabasappa & Ors on 11 May, 2000
In view of the circumstances of the case and laid laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court, I find that these writ petitions are next chapter in the litigative acrobatics of the petitioners. Such practices must not only be deprecated but an attempt deserves to be made to curb the growing tendency of the tenants to dilly delaying their eviction and, thereby, causing an impression that civil law remedies are time consuming and do not bother to protect the interest of the landlords. The petitions are accordingly dismissed with cost of Rs.10,000/- each, which shall be deposited by the petitioners before the learned Trial Court within 30 days from today, failing which it shall be recoverable as arrears of land revenue, through the learned Trial Court.
Section 35B in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Manohar Singh vs D.S. Sharma & Anr on 13 November, 2009
6. The Hon'ble Apex Court has dealt with the matter in Manohar Singh v. D.S. Sharma and another, 2010 (28) LCD 175, in which it has been held:-
Section 25 in The Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 [Entire Act]
1