Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.18 seconds)THE COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015
M/S Icici Bank Limited vs Kamini Sharma & Anr on 31 January, 2018
20.The judgments of our own High Court viz. ICICI Bank Limited
versus Kamini Sharma & Another' passed on 31.01.2018 in RFA
No. 297/2015 and in ICICI Bank Ltd. vs. Sunil Sharma passed in
RFA 340/2015 on 31.01.2018 can be read with profit on this
aspect. In these judgments a pronouncement has been made
regarding appreciation of documentary evidence in cases of public
financial institution, appreciation/certification of electronic
evidence etc. and the same are also applicable in the facts and
circumstances of this case. The sum and substance of the facts of
the said case are similarly placed as the facts in the case under
CS (Comm.) No. 591/2019 Page 6 of 10
consideration.
Man Kaur(Dead)By Lrs vs Hartar Singh Sangha on 5 October, 2010
22.One pertinent question that may arise is whether the power to give
evidence can be delegated. The answer has to be in negative in
view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Man Kaur
(Dead) by LRs vs. Hartar Singh Sandhwa (2010) 10 SCC 512.
M/S Icici Bank Limited vs Sunil Sharma on 31 January, 2018
20.The judgments of our own High Court viz. ICICI Bank Limited
versus Kamini Sharma & Another' passed on 31.01.2018 in RFA
No. 297/2015 and in ICICI Bank Ltd. vs. Sunil Sharma passed in
RFA 340/2015 on 31.01.2018 can be read with profit on this
aspect. In these judgments a pronouncement has been made
regarding appreciation of documentary evidence in cases of public
financial institution, appreciation/certification of electronic
evidence etc. and the same are also applicable in the facts and
circumstances of this case. The sum and substance of the facts of
the said case are similarly placed as the facts in the case under
CS (Comm.) No. 591/2019 Page 6 of 10
consideration.
Section 85 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Bankers Books Evidence Act, 1891
1