Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.25 seconds)
Jolen Inc., Rep. By Its Constituted ... vs Mr. Shobanlal Jain, Hindustan Rimmer, ... on 30 April, 2004 cites

Jolen Inc. vs Doctor & Company on 6 May, 2002

41. Learned senior counsel for the respondents submitted that the cases relied upon by the learned senior counsel for the appellant are distinguishable and the decision of the Delhi High Court in the appellant's own case (Jolen Inc. v. Doctor & Company 2002(2) CTMR 6) has been rendered without any evidence. He referred to the orders of the Registrar of Trade Marks and submitted that the appellant has not established the trans-border reputation.
Delhi High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 25 - J D Kapoor - Full Document

Alfred Dunhill Limited vs Kartar Singh Makkar & Ors. on 1 March, 1999

37. The question that arises is whether the appellant has established the trans-border reputation. Learned senior counsel for the appellant referred to the following decisions: (i) N.R. DONGRE v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION , (ii) N.R. DONGRE v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION (1996 PTC (16) 583), (iii) HAW PAR BROTHERS v. TIGER BALM & CO (1996 PTC (16) 311), (iv) CATERPILLAR V. JORANGE (1998 PTC (18) 31), (v) CALVINKLEIN v. INTERNATIONAL APPARELS SYNDICATE (1996 PTC (16) 293), (vi) REVLON INC. v. SARITA (1997 PTC (17) 394), (vii) ALFRED DUNHILL v. KARTAR SINGH MAKKAR (1999 PTC (19) 294), (ix) JOLEN INC. v. DOCTOR & CO. (2002 (2) CTMR 6), (x) HONDA MOTORS LTD. v. CHARANJIT SINGH (2003 (23) PTC 1) and (xi) PIZZA HUT v. PIZZA HUT INDIA (2003 (23) PTC 208).
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 23 - M S Siddiqui - Full Document

Ramu Hosieries, Re. By Its Sole ... vs Ramu Hosieries, Rep. By Its Partner ... on 6 July, 1998

19. We are inclined to follow the decision of Division Bench of this Court in Ramu Hosieries case (1999 PTC (19) 183) and we hold that there are no reasons to take a different view from the view taken by the Division Bench that advertisement is a step in the process of infringement to solicit customers in the name of the impugned trademark and we are of the view that the advertisement of the respondents' goods in the magazines having circulation in India would constitute cause of action to maintain a suit for passing off action as well. Therefore, the view of the learned Judge that the jurisdiction was invented for the purpose of this case is not sustainable.
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

Century Traders vs Roshan Lal Duggar Co. on 27 April, 1977

This Court also noticed the judgments in Century Traders v. Roshan Lal Duggar and Co and Sushil Vasudev v. M/s. Kwality Frosen Foods Private Limited (1993 (1) Kar. L.J.609) which was confirmed on appeal in C.A.No.234 of 1994 by order of the Supreme Court dated 19.7.1994 and ultimately in paragraph-87 it held that the prior registration of trademark is not a ground in the case of passing off action.
Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 239 - Full Document

Honda Motors Co. Ltd. vs Mr. Charanjit Singh And Ors. on 28 November, 2002

37. The question that arises is whether the appellant has established the trans-border reputation. Learned senior counsel for the appellant referred to the following decisions: (i) N.R. DONGRE v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION , (ii) N.R. DONGRE v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION (1996 PTC (16) 583), (iii) HAW PAR BROTHERS v. TIGER BALM & CO (1996 PTC (16) 311), (iv) CATERPILLAR V. JORANGE (1998 PTC (18) 31), (v) CALVINKLEIN v. INTERNATIONAL APPARELS SYNDICATE (1996 PTC (16) 293), (vi) REVLON INC. v. SARITA (1997 PTC (17) 394), (vii) ALFRED DUNHILL v. KARTAR SINGH MAKKAR (1999 PTC (19) 294), (ix) JOLEN INC. v. DOCTOR & CO. (2002 (2) CTMR 6), (x) HONDA MOTORS LTD. v. CHARANJIT SINGH (2003 (23) PTC 1) and (xi) PIZZA HUT v. PIZZA HUT INDIA (2003 (23) PTC 208).
Delhi High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 41 - S Aggarwal - Full Document

Pizza Hut International Llc And Pizza ... vs Pizza Hut India Pvt. Ltd. on 26 July, 2002

37. The question that arises is whether the appellant has established the trans-border reputation. Learned senior counsel for the appellant referred to the following decisions: (i) N.R. DONGRE v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION , (ii) N.R. DONGRE v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION (1996 PTC (16) 583), (iii) HAW PAR BROTHERS v. TIGER BALM & CO (1996 PTC (16) 311), (iv) CATERPILLAR V. JORANGE (1998 PTC (18) 31), (v) CALVINKLEIN v. INTERNATIONAL APPARELS SYNDICATE (1996 PTC (16) 293), (vi) REVLON INC. v. SARITA (1997 PTC (17) 394), (vii) ALFRED DUNHILL v. KARTAR SINGH MAKKAR (1999 PTC (19) 294), (ix) JOLEN INC. v. DOCTOR & CO. (2002 (2) CTMR 6), (x) HONDA MOTORS LTD. v. CHARANJIT SINGH (2003 (23) PTC 1) and (xi) PIZZA HUT v. PIZZA HUT INDIA (2003 (23) PTC 208).
Bombay High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 10 - S J Vazifdar - Full Document
1   2 3 Next