Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.29 seconds)
Sh. Vivek Kumar Sharma vs Sh. Achal Jandev on 30 July, 2019 cites

Vivek Kumar Sharma vs Achal Jandev on 17 April, 2018

In view of the findings returned herein above as also the law laid down by Hon'ble Coordinate bench of this Court in Neelam Singha's case supra, this petition is allowed and impugned order dated 13.09.2018, passed by learned Rent Controller-II, Solan, in CMA No. 204/6 of 2018, titled as Sh. Vivek Sharma, vs. Achal Jandev, is quashed and set aside with a further direction to learned Rent Controller to accept the Bank Draft which was deposited by the petitioner/tenant before it as arrears of rent.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - S Thakur - Full Document

Hans Raj Khimta vs Smt. Kanwaljeet Kaur Alias Sardarni ... on 29 February, 2016

Khimta supra and Pradeep Aggarwal supra, are concerned, in my considered view, said judgments were not applicable in the facts of the present case. In none of the above two cases, there was any direction issued by learned Rent Controller at the time of allowing the eviction petition that the arrears of rent be paid by the tenant either to the landlord or the same be deposited in the Court. In the absence of any such direction, but obvious, the tenant was bound to first tender the arrears of rent to the landlord and in the event of landlord refusing to accept the case, the tenant could have had deposited the same in the Court by filing appropriate application.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 7 - S Karol - Full Document

Pradeep Aggarwal vs Maya Poddar And Another on 9 July, 2018

Khimta supra and Pradeep Aggarwal supra, are concerned, in my considered view, said judgments were not applicable in the facts of the present case. In none of the above two cases, there was any direction issued by learned Rent Controller at the time of allowing the eviction petition that the arrears of rent be paid by the tenant either to the landlord or the same be deposited in the Court. In the absence of any such direction, but obvious, the tenant was bound to first tender the arrears of rent to the landlord and in the event of landlord refusing to accept the case, the tenant could have had deposited the same in the Court by filing appropriate application.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - S Sharma - Full Document

Neelam Singha vs Bawa Jung Bahadur on 14 March, 2019

In view of the findings returned herein above as also the law laid down by Hon'ble Coordinate bench of this Court in Neelam Singha's case supra, this petition is allowed and impugned order dated 13.09.2018, passed by learned Rent Controller-II, Solan, in CMA No. 204/6 of 2018, titled as Sh. Vivek Sharma, vs. Achal Jandev, is quashed and set aside with a further direction to learned Rent Controller to accept the Bank Draft which was deposited by the petitioner/tenant before it as arrears of rent.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 2 - T S Chauhan - Full Document
1