Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (1.11 seconds)
State Of Kerala vs M N Narayanadas @ Satheesh on 30 June, 2025 cites

Central Bureau Of Investigation, ... vs Anupam J. Kulkarni on 8 May, 1992

The larger Bench of this Court in Budh Singh v. State of Punjab [Budh Singh v. State of Punjab, (2000) 9 SCC 266] , mainly gave its imprimatur to the findings rendered in Anupam J. Kulkarni [CBI v. Anupam J. Kulkarni, (1992) 3 SCC 141 : 1992 SCC (Cri) 554] . Allowing the said interpretation which in our respectful view is contrary to the very mandate of Section 167(2)CrPC, 1973 would cause serious prejudice to the investigation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 316 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Pranay Sethi on 31 October, 2017

6. Although learned counsel for the respondent contended that the subsequent judgment is per incuriam, having been rendered contrary to the findings in an earlier judgment, in the case at hand, the second judgment was rendered after considering the findings in the earlier judgment and stating the reasons as to why those findings are incorrect. Yet another pertinent aspect is that in Pranay Sethi (supra), the subsequent judgment was held per incuriam as it was rendered without noticing the earlier judgment, as evident from Paragraph 28 of that judgment, extracted below for easy reference;
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 9815 - D Misra - Full Document

Rajesh Kumar Rai & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 30 May, 2017

Support for this proposition is also sought to be drawn by relying on the decision in Rajnish Kumar Rai v. Union of India and Others [2023 LiveLaw (SC) 842]. It is submitted that in V.Senthil Balaji, the Apex Court referred the question whether the 15 days' period of custody in favour of the police under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. can only be within the first 15 days of remand or can span over the entire period of investigation, viz; 60 or 90 days, as the case may be, to a larger Bench for an authoritative pronouncement on the issue.
Delhi High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 3 - S Khanna - Full Document
1   2 Next