Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.24 seconds)
Sandeep Kumar vs Union Of India & Ors on 3 December, 2013 cites

Bhupinderpal Singh & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 1 May, 2000

In this connection, he has placed reliance on 4 (four) decisions of the Apex Court as reported in (2000) 5 SCC 262 (Bhupinderpal Singh Vs. State Punjab) ; (1990) 2 SCC 669 (A.P. Public Service Commission Vs. B. Sarat Chandra) ; 1993 supp (3) SCC 168 (Rakha Chaturvedi (Smt) Vs. University of Rajasthan and others and AIR 1952 SC 16 (Commissioner of Police, Bombay Vs. Gordhandas Bhanji).
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 178 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

A.P. Public Service Commission, ... vs B. Sarat Chandra & Ors on 10 April, 1990

In this connection, he has placed reliance on 4 (four) decisions of the Apex Court as reported in (2000) 5 SCC 262 (Bhupinderpal Singh Vs. State Punjab) ; (1990) 2 SCC 669 (A.P. Public Service Commission Vs. B. Sarat Chandra) ; 1993 supp (3) SCC 168 (Rakha Chaturvedi (Smt) Vs. University of Rajasthan and others and AIR 1952 SC 16 (Commissioner of Police, Bombay Vs. Gordhandas Bhanji).
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 253 - K J Shetty - Full Document

Mrs. Rekha Chaturvedi vs University Of Rajasthan And Ors on 13 January, 1993

In WP(C) 735-765-771-782 of 13 oral dt-3-12-13 Page 12 of 16 Rekha Chaturvedi (Supra) dealing with the judicial review in respect of a selection at a belated stage, it was held that the case having been taken up for decision after about 8(eight) years of the appointment of the selected candidates, the case of the petitioner was required to be considered in reference to the said date. None of the decisions is of any help to the case of the petitioners.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 328 - P B Sawant - Full Document

Commissioner Of Police, Bombay vs Gordhandas Bhanji on 23 November, 1951

In Gordhandas Bhanji (Supra) has been referred to so as to emphasis that the action of the respondents will have to be WP(C) 735-765-771-782 of 13 oral dt-3-12-13 Page 13 of 16 judged on the basis of the reason available on the date of taking the decision and cannot be allowed to be supplemented by further reasons assigned in the counter affidavit. There is no quarrel with this proposition of law. Although, there was a direction for re-medical examination of the petitioners but at the same time, the Assam Rifles authority was also invested with the power and jurisdiction which otherwise also it possesses to take into account the other relevant factors regarding unfitness of the petitioners to be re-engaged / reappointed in the Assam Rifles. The authority having considered the relevant aspects of the matter towards passing the impugned orders, it is not a case of projecting other grounds/ reasons other than the reason which was assigned at the time of passing the impugned orders.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 973 - V Bose - Full Document
1