Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.15 seconds)
Amarjeet Singh vs State Of U.P.Through Prin Secy Finance ... on 25 September, 2019 cites

Ram Chandra Yadav vs State Of U.P. And Others on 16 January, 2013

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already been regularized vide order dated 10.03.2016 passed by the Director of Internal Accounts and Audits, U.P., Directorate, U.P. He has also relied on the judgment of the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of "Ram Chandra Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and others 2012 (3) ADJ" and relied the para 5 which is quoted as under:
Allahabad High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 18 - Full Document

Sanjay Kumar Srivastava Son Of Sri D.P. ... vs Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest ... on 17 October, 2005

It is why expression has been used in the Rule that a person should be continued in service on the date when the Rule came into force. The rule does not contemplate uninterrupted continuous service. The contention raised on behalf of the respondent is reading something into the rule which is not intended thereby. Reliance has been placed on the judgement of this Court in the case of Sanjay Kumar Srivastava Vs. Principal, Chief Conservator of Forest, U.P., Lucknow and others, 2005(4) ESC 2633 (All) reliance has also been placed on the judgement of the Apex Court in the case of State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal, (2002) 2 UPLBEC 1595."
Allahabad High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 7 - S Ambwani - Full Document

State Of U.P. And Ors. vs Putti Lal on 21 February, 2002

It is why expression has been used in the Rule that a person should be continued in service on the date when the Rule came into force. The rule does not contemplate uninterrupted continuous service. The contention raised on behalf of the respondent is reading something into the rule which is not intended thereby. Reliance has been placed on the judgement of this Court in the case of Sanjay Kumar Srivastava Vs. Principal, Chief Conservator of Forest, U.P., Lucknow and others, 2005(4) ESC 2633 (All) reliance has also been placed on the judgement of the Apex Court in the case of State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal, (2002) 2 UPLBEC 1595."
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 326 - Full Document
1