Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.32 seconds)The Hindu Succession Act, 1956
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
The Registration Act, 1908
Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma & Ors on 15 May, 2018
28. The provisions contained in Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act
as amended by Act 39 of 2005 have been explained by the
Supreme Court in the case of „Vineeta Sharma Vs. Rakesh
Sharma and Ors‟, (2020) 9 SCC 1. The Supreme Court has, in
the said case while answering the reference concerning the
interpretation of Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act as
amended by Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, held
as under :-
Section 88 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Vijay Pratap Singh vs Dukh Haran Nath Singh And Another (And ... on 19 January, 1962
19. The Supreme Court has, in the case of "Vijay Pratap Singh &
Anr Vs Dukh Haran Nath Singh", AIR 1962 SC 941 while
discussing the scope of enquiry which a Civil Court has to
undertake while determining whether or not the plaint
discloses cause of action, held as under:
Liverpool & London S.P. & I Asson. Ltd vs M.V. Sea Success I & Anr on 20 November, 2003
45. The Supreme Court in the case of Liverpool & London S.P. &
I Association Ltd (supra) while relying upon the ratio laid in
Azhar Hussain Vs. Rajiv Gandhi, 1986 (Supp) SCC 315 has
explained the object of the provisions contained in Order VII
Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure in the following manner:
Prasanta Kumar Sahoo vs Charulata Sahu . on 29 March, 2023
29. The ratio laid down by the Supreme Court in the aforesaid
case was explained by the said Court in its later judgment
delivered in the case of „Prasanta Kumar Sahoo and Ors Vs.
Charulata Sahu and Ors‟, (2023) 9 SCC 641.