Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.31 seconds)Section 2 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 25F in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 17B in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 25H in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 15 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
Section 28 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
The Minimum Wages Act, 1948
Workmen Of American Express ... vs Management Of American Express ... on 28 August, 1985
21. So far as continuous service as defined under Section 25-B
of the I.D. Act, in a recent Judgment dated 11.03.2025, this Court in
W.P.(C) No.20644 of 2017 (The Management of M/s. Hare Krushna
Mahatab Library, Bhubaneswar Vs. Prasanna Kumar Sethi), discussed
the definition of continuous service as defined under section 25-B of the
I.D. Act referring to the Judgments of the Supreme Court in Workman
of American Express International Banking Corporation Vs.
Management of American Express International Banking
Corporation; (1985) 4 SCC 71, so also in U.P. Drugs &
Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd. Vs. Ramnuj Yadav and others; (2003) 8 SCC
334 and held that uninterrupted working for 240 days in the preceding
twelve months from the date of termination of service is not necessary to
constitute „continuous service‟. Even though a Workman has not worked
for more than 240 days during the preceding twelve months of his
retrenchment/termination, if he has worked for more than 240 days in
any of the preceding years, he would be deemed to be in continuous
service and his retrenchment would be illegal, if the same has not been
done by the employer without adhering to the provisions of the I.D. Act.
Haryana State Elctronics Development ... vs Mamni on 2 May, 2006
As such, in view of the
ratio in the case of Haryana State Electronics Development
Corporation Ltd (supra), action of the Management in terminating the
Workman will not fall within the scope of Section 2(oo) (bb) of the
I.D. Act.