Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.49 seconds)

Dinesh Dutt Joshi vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr on 1 October, 2001

In Dinesh Dutt Joshi v. State of Rajasthan [(2001) 8 SCC 570: 2002 SCC (Cri) 24] , while dealing with the inherent powers of the High Court, this Court has observed thus: (SCC p. 573, para 6) „6. ... The principle embodied in the section is based upon the maxim:quando lex aliquid alicui concedit, concedere videtur et id sine quo res ipsae esse non potest i.e. when the Crl. M.C. No.1280/2014 Page 9 of 12 law gives anything to anyone, it gives also all those things without which the thing itself would be unavailable. The section does not confer any new power, but only declares that the High Court possesses inherent powers for the purposes specified in the section. As lacunae are sometimes found in procedural law, the section has been embodied to cover such lacunae wherever they are discovered.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 81 - Full Document

Punjab State Warehousing ... vs M/S Sh.Durga Ji Traders & Ors on 28 November, 2011

16. It is correct that the dismissal of a complaint in a summons case results in acquittal of the accused as envisaged in Section 256 of Cr.P.C. It is also true that the complainant can challenge the order of acquittal by filing an application for special leave to appeal. A similar question came up for consideration before the Apex Court in „Punjab State Warehousing Corporation vs. Shree Durga Ji Traders‟, (2011) 4 SCC 615. In the said case the High Court had dismissed the petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for setting aside of complaint in default and restoration thereof by holding that dismissal in default of complaint amounts to acquittal of accused and statutory remedy exists in Cr.P.C., a petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. cannot be entertained. The Hon‟ble Supreme Court while considering various judgments passed from time to time observed as under: -
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 38 - Full Document

Jeffrey J.Diermeier & Anr vs State Of West Bengal & Anr on 14 May, 2010

In this behalf it would be profitable to refer to the decision of this Court in Jeffrey J. Diermeier v. State of W.B. [(2010) 6 SCC 243 : (2010) 2 Crl. M.C. No.1280/2014 Page 8 of 12 SCC (Civ) 656 : (2010) 3 SCC (Cri) 138] wherein one of us (D.K. Jain, J.), speaking for the Bench, explained the scope and ambit of inherent powers of the High Court under Section 482 of the Code as follows: (SCC p. 251, paras 20 & 22)
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 206 - D K Jain - Full Document
1